Click Here For A Consultation

Policy Manual Update: Safe Address and Special Procedures for Certain Protected Persons

Client Alert!

USCIS announced that it is updating policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to provide guidance on mailing address procedures for persons protected under 8 U.S.C. 1367. This includes persons eligible for and recipients of victim-based immigration relief, specifically Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners, as well as those who are seeking or currently hold T and U nonimmigrant status for victims of trafficking and qualifying crimes. USCIS also extends these provisions to abused spouses of certain nonimmigrants applying for employment authorization under section 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

USCIS must ensure that information related to a protected person is disclosed only to authorized parties identified by the protected person. In the context of mailed correspondence, we have implemented procedures to minimize the risk of unauthorized parties viewing the protected information. This update provides guidance to the public and USCIS employees on mailing addresses and adjudication procedures for victim-based and non-victim-based forms filed by protected persons.

Policy Highlights

  • Provides that USCIS must review each form individually to determine where to send notices and secure identity documents, taking into consideration the protected person’s selections regarding receipt of USCIS notices and documents on the Form G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative.
  • Explains that non-victim-based benefit requests should be adjudicated independent of the victim-based benefit requests without reference to previously filed victim-based applications or petitions in any correspondence.
  • Provides clear guidance on mailing address procedures for protected persons represented by an attorney or accredited representative and those without an attorney or accredited representative, as well as those with multiple pending forms.
  • Explains that the prohibition on adverse determinations described in 8 U.S.C. 1367(a)(1) applies to all cases where a protected person is an applicant, beneficiary, or petitioner. Therefore, even if an officer is adjudicating a non-victim-based application or petition, the officer cannot make adverse case determinations based solely on information provided by a prohibited source.

Click the link for more information.

Share:

More Posts

What To Do If ICE Comes To Your Business

Client Alert! As businesses face increasing scrutiny from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), it’s essential to be prepared in case agents come to inspect

How to Correct Errors on Your I-94

Client Alert! If you’ve recently traveled to the United States, it’s important to review your I-94 document for accuracy. Errors on the I-94, such as

Send Us A Message

Dana Davidson - Full Bio

Dana T. Davidson holds degrees from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and State University of New York at Stony Brook and has been practicing immigration law since 2003 in New York and nationwide. She represents corporations, individuals, and families in a broad range of immigration matters. Attorney Davidson has offices in New York City and Glen Cove.
 

Education

  • Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, New York, New York
  • Juris Doctor – 1988
  • Honors: Moot Court Board, Member, Judge
  • State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York
  • Bachelor of Arts – 1982
  • Major: Political Science
  • Concentration: Business


Pro-Bono Activities

  • Safe Passage Project, Volunteer Attorney, 2013-Present
  • Educating the Educators, Founder, 2012-Present
  • Momentum Project, Board Member, 1991-1994 Bar Admission
  • New York, Eastern District
  • New York, Southern District
  • Washington, D.C.

Speaking Engagements
 
  • AILA RDC-EMEA Spring Conference 2018, Berlin, Germany, Speaker on “Public Charge” panel
  • AILA RDC-EMEA Fall Conference 2018, Johannesburg, South Africa, Speaker: “Practice Management in the New Age” panel
  • AILA RDC-EMEA Spring Conference 2018, Madrid, Spain, Speaker: “El Traje de Luces: Self-Sponsored Petitions – EB-1A and NIW”  AILA RDC-EMEA Spring Conference 2017, Brussels, Belgium, Speaker: “Continuing Blanket L Challenges”
  • Safe Passage Project, March 2017, Speaker: “Representing Unaccompanied Minors: Special Immigrant Juvenile Status and the Effects of President Trump’s Executive Orders on Immigration”
  • AILA RDC-EMEA Fall Conference 2016, Speaker: “It’s Not About Money: I-864”
  • AILA RDC-EMEA Spring Conference 2016, Vienna, Austria, Speaker: “K-Visa: Differences Between K-1 and I-130 Processing”
  • New York Institute of Technology’s Center for Entrepreneurship, January 2016, Entrepreneur/Executive-in-Residence
  • AILA Fall Conference 2015, London, UK, Speaker: Impact of joint sponsors on family-based cases
  • Goldman-Sachs 10,000 Small Business Education Program, October 2014, “What is required to grow a business?”
  • Dowling College, May 2013, Keynote Speaker at the first annual Latino Summit at Dowling College
  • International Taxation Conference, 2010